|  e-ISSN: 2757-6620

Original article | Journal of Agricultural Production 2022, Vol. 3(1) 1-8

Yield and Quality Response of Canola to Seed Row and Side Banded Ammonium Sulfate and Ammonium Thiosulfate

Ikenna Mbakwe & Omotayo Adegeye

pp. 1 - 8   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/agripro.2022.413.1   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2202-17-0001.R1

Published online: June 28, 2022  |   Number of Views: 15  |  Number of Download: 405


Ammonium sulfate (AMS) and ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) are two of the most common sulfur products applied during canola seeding in the Canadian Prairies. A better understanding of how application methods affect the efficiency of these products is warranted. A field trial was conducted on a clay loam soil in Pense, Saskatchewan to evaluate the effect of seed row and side banded sulfur applications on canola yield and quality. Plots received 34 kg ha-1 sulfur either from AMS or ATS applied during seeding either in the seed row (SR) or side banded (SB). A treatment without sulfur was included as a control. All plots received the same amounts of all other nutrients. Results showed that average seed yields increased for all sulfur-treated plots, however, only side banded applications (AMS(SB): 4020 kg ha-1, ATS (SB): 3883 kg ha-1) were significantly better than the control (3072 kg ha-1). Side banded sulfur applications generally produced more protein than seed row applications and were significantly different from the control. AMS (SB) had the highest protein content (21.07%) while the control had the least (18.13%). Oil content was similar except for AMS (SB) (46.72%) which was significantly lower than the control (48.68%). However, this oil difference was more than compensated by the increased yield from AMS (SB). Applying AMS and ATS in the seed row can decrease the yield and protein response that might otherwise be seen when these products are side banded. There were no significant differences in the measured parameters between AMS and ATS.

Keywords: Canola, Sulfur, Ammonium sulfate, Ammonium thiosulfate

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Mbakwe, I. & Adegeye, O. (2022). Yield and Quality Response of Canola to Seed Row and Side Banded Ammonium Sulfate and Ammonium Thiosulfate . Journal of Agricultural Production, 3(1), 1-8. doi: 10.29329/agripro.2022.413.1

Mbakwe, I. and Adegeye, O. (2022). Yield and Quality Response of Canola to Seed Row and Side Banded Ammonium Sulfate and Ammonium Thiosulfate . Journal of Agricultural Production, 3(1), pp. 1-8.

Chicago 16th edition
Mbakwe, Ikenna and Omotayo Adegeye (2022). "Yield and Quality Response of Canola to Seed Row and Side Banded Ammonium Sulfate and Ammonium Thiosulfate ". Journal of Agricultural Production 3 (1):1-8. doi:10.29329/agripro.2022.413.1.


    Ahmad, G., Jan, A., Arif, M., Jan, M. T., & Khattak, R. A. (2007). Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 8(10), 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1631%2Fjzus.2007.B

    Ahmad, G., Jan, A., Arif, M., Jan, M. T., & Shah, H. (2011). Effect of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on yield components, seed and oil yields of canola. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34(14), 2069-2082. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2011.618569

    Angadi, S. V., Cutforth, H. W., McConkey, B. G., & Gan, Y. (2003). Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions. Crop Science, 43(4), 1358-1366. https://doi.org/10.2135/crop

    Bandara, N., Akbari, A., Esparza, Y., & Wu, J. (2018). Canola protein: A promising protein source for delivery, adhesive, and material applications. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 95(8), 1075-1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12039

    Behera, S. K., Shukla, A. K., Prakash, C., Tripathi, A., Kumar, A., & Trivedi, V. (2021). Establishing management zones of soil sulfur and micronutrients for sustainable crop production. Land Degradation & Development, 32(13), 3614-3625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3698

    Blackshaw, R. E., Johnson, E. N., Gan, Y., May, W. E., McAndrew, D. W., Barthet, V., McDonald, T., & Wispinski, D. (2011). Alternative oilseed crops for biodiesel feedstock on the Canadian prairies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 91(5), 889-896. http://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2011-002

    Campbell, L., Rempel, C. B., & Wanasundara, J. P. D. (2016). Canola/rapeseed protein: Future opportunities and directions - Workshop proceedings of IRC 2015. Plants (Basel), 5(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants5020017

    Elliott, R. H., Franke, C., & Rakow, G. F. W. (2008). Effects of seed size and seed weight on seedling establishment, vigour and tolerance of Argentine canola (Brassica napus) to flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 88(1), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS07059

    Germida, J. J., & Janzen, H. H. (1993). Factors affecting the oxidation of elemental sulfur in soils. Fertilizer Research, 35(1), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0

    Gezerman, A. O. (2019). Effects of ammonium thiosulfate and guanyl thiourea as calcium ammonium nitrate inhibitors on fertilization and plants. Chemical Review and Letters, 2(2), 84-89. http://doi.org/10.22034/crl.2019.196404.

    Govahi, M., & Saffari, M. (2006). Effect of potassium and sulphur fertilizers on yield, yield components and seed quality of spring canola (Brassica napus L.) seed. Journal of Agronomy, 5, 577-582. https://doi.org/10.39

    Grant, C. A., Clayton, G. W., & Johnston, A. M. (2003). Sulphur fertilizer and tillage effects on canola seed quality in the Black soil zone of western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83(4), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.4141/P02-107

    Grant, C. A., Johnston, A. M., & Clayton, G. W. (2004). Sulphur fertilizer and tillage management of canola and wheat in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 84(2), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.4141/P02-083

    Malhi, S. S., & Gill, K. S. (2002). Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 82(4), 665-674. https://doi.org/10.4141

    Malhi, S. S., Schoenau, J. J., & Grant, C. A. (2005). A review of sulphur fertilizer management for optimum yield and quality of canola in the Canadian Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 85(2), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.4141/P04-140

    Malhi, S. S., & Gill, K. S. (2006). Cultivar and fertilizer S rate interaction effects on canola yield, seed quality and S uptake. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(1), 91-98. http://doi.org/10.4141/P05-058

    McCarty, G. W., Bremner, J. M., & Krogmeier, M. J. (1990). Evaluation of ammonium thiosulfate as a soil urease inhibitor. Fertilizer Research, 24(3), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073581

    Piotrowska-Długosz, A., Siwik-Ziomek, A., Długosz, J., & Gozdowski, D. (2017). Spatio-temporal variability of soil sulfur content and arylsulfatase activity at a conventionally managed arable field. Geoderma, 295, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.0

    Prem, D., Gupta, K., Sarkar, G., & Agnihotri, A. (2012). Determination of oil, protein and moisture content in whole seeds of three oleiferous Brassica species using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Oilseed Brassica, 3(2), 88-98.

    Qian, P., Urton, R., Schoenau, J. J., King, T., Fatteicher, C., & Grant, C. (2012). Effect of seed-placed ammonium sulfate and monoammonium phosphate on germination, emergence and early plant biomass production of Brassicae oilseed crops. In U.G. Akpan (Ed.), Oilseeds (pp. 53-62). InTech.

    Rathke, G. W., Christen, O., & Diepenbrock, W. (2005). Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Research, 94(2-3), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.010

    Sedberry, J. E., Amacher, M. C., Bligh, D. P., & Curtis, O. D. (1987). Plant-tissue analysis as a diagnostic aid in crop production. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Agricultural Experiment Station Reports, Bulletin no. 783.

    Sullivan, D. M., & Havlin, J. L. (1992). Thiosulfate inhibition of urea hydrolysis in soils: Tetrathionate as a urease inhibitor. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(3), 957-960. http://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.036

    Urton, R., Hangs, R. D., Schoenau, J. J., & Grant, C. A. (2018). The response of a high-yielding canola hybrid to sulfur fertilization in three contrasting Saskatchewan soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 41(15), 1957-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1482917

    van Maarschalkerweerd, M., & Husted, S. (2015). Recent developments in fast spectroscopy for plant mineral analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00169

    Wetter, L. R., Ukrainetz, H., & Downey, R. K. (1970). Effect of chemical fertilizers on the contents of oil, protein and glucosinolates in Brassica including rapeseed. Proceeding of the International Conference on Rapeseed and Rapeseed Products. St Adele, Canada.