<em>In vitro</em> Effect of Bacterial Biocontrol Organisms against <em>Pectobacterium carotovorum</em> on Potato

Fatih Dadaşoğlu, John Fredy Maldonado Coy, Gülsüm Özyurt & Recep Kotan

doi:https://doi.org/10.29329/agripro.2020.341.3

Original article | Journal of Agricultural Production 2020, Vol. 1(1) 8-11

In vitro Effect of Bacterial Biocontrol Organisms against Pectobacterium carotovorum on Potato

Fatih Dadaşoğlu, John Fredy Maldonado Coy, Gülsüm Özyurt & Recep Kotan

pp. 8 - 11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/agripro.2020.341.3 | Manu. Number: MANU-2104-14-0002

Published online: December 31, 2020 | Number of Views: 63 | Number of Download: 563

Save PDF

Abstract

Soft rot is a disease that cause substantial economic losses in potato production. Pectobacterium carotovorum is known as one of the most common soft rot causative agents and the disease has not effective control methods being developed yet. In this study the effect of 3 different bacterial isolates of Bacillus megaterium (B60d, TV6D, TV91C), 2 of Paenibacillus polymyxa (Ç9, TV12E), 2 of Bacillus subtilis (TV6F, TV17C), 1 of Pantoea agglomerans (B79), 1 of Agrobacterium radiobacter (A16), 1 of Bacillus megaterium gc. subgroup A (FDG161), 1 of Bacillus atrophaeus (FD1), 1 of Pseudomonas fluorescens biotype F (FDG37) and 1 of Bacillus pumilus (TV3D) were tested against 5 pathogenic bacterial strains of P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (F37, F680, F741, F331, F742), using dual culture method in in vitro conditions. The most effective bacterial isolate against strains Pectobacterium were P. carotovorum F37 + Bacillus megaterium B60d (55,00 mm) isolate, followed by P. carotovorum F680 + Bacillus megaterium B60d (44,00 mm) and P. carotovorum F742 + Bacillus megaterium B60d (39,33 mm) isolates. Therefore, Bacillus megaterium has a promising biocontrol activity against tested plant pathogenic bacteria under in vitro conditions.

Keywords: MIS, BIOLOG, Pectolytic activity, Soft rot, Pectobacterium carotovorum.

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Dadasoglu, F., Coy, J.F.M., Ozyurt, G. & Kotan, R. (2020). In vitro Effect of Bacterial Biocontrol Organisms against Pectobacterium carotovorum on Potato . Journal of Agricultural Production, 1(1), 8-11. doi: 10.29329/agripro.2020.341.3

Harvard
Dadasoglu, F., Coy, J., Ozyurt, G. and Kotan, R. (2020). In vitro Effect of Bacterial Biocontrol Organisms against Pectobacterium carotovorum on Potato . Journal of Agricultural Production, 1(1), pp. 8-11.

Chicago 16th edition
Dadasoglu, Fatih, John Fredy Maldonado Coy, Gulsum Ozyurt and Recep Kotan (2020). "In vitro Effect of Bacterial Biocontrol Organisms against Pectobacterium carotovorum on Potato ". Journal of Agricultural Production 1 (1):8-11. doi:10.29329/agripro.2020.341.3.

References

Aizawa, S.-I. (2014). Pectobacterium carotovorum - Subpolar Hyper-Flagellation. In The Flagellar World (pp. 58-59). [Google Scholar]
Bender, C., Malvick, D., Conway, K., George, S., & Pratt, P. (1990). Characterization of pXV10A, a copper resistance plasmid in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Applied And Environmental Microbiology, 56(1): 170-175. [Google Scholar]
Cooksey, D. A. (1990). Genetics of bactericide resistance in plant pathogenic bacteria. Annual reviews Phytopathol, 28: 201-219. [Google Scholar]
FAO. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_commodity. Date Accessed: 23.12.2018. [Google Scholar]
Jeong-A, L., Samnyu, J., Dong Hwan, L., Eunjung, R., Kyusuk, J., Changsik, O., & Sunggi, H. (2013). Biocontrol of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Using Bacteriophage PP1. Microbiol Biotechnol, 23(8): 232-955. [Google Scholar]
Marquez-Villavicencio, M. d., Groves, R. L., & Charkowski, A. O. (2011). Soft rot disease severity is affected by potato physiology and Pectobacterium taxa. Plant Disease, 95: 232-241. [Google Scholar]
Mota, M. S., BauerGomes, C., Souza Júnior, I. T., & Moura, A. B. (2016). Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 48(1): 62-70. [Google Scholar]
Ngadze, E. (2012). Identification and control of potato soft rot and blackleg pathogens in Zimbabwe. Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology. Zimbabwe: Doctorate thesis, University of Pretoria. [Google Scholar]
Rahman, M. M., Khan, A. A., Mian, I. H., Akanda, A. M., & Alam, M. Z. (2017). Effect of some chemicals on incidence of poato soft rot disease in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal Of Scientific And Industrial Research, 2(52): 135-140. [Google Scholar]
Schisler, D., & Slininger, P. (1997). Microbial selection strategies that enhance the likelihood of developing commercial biological control products. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 19: 172-179. [Google Scholar]
Seebold, K. W. (2014). Blackleg & Bacterial Soft Rot of Potato. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Plant Pathology Extension, 18: 2. [Google Scholar]

Volume 1 Issue 1

December 2020

All Articles